The ancient Greeks had no need of any political parties. How can you be so sure that we shall be divided into political parties and to govern society in the IT era by representative democracy instead of direct democratic nomocracy?
There are a lot of large shareholders and a group of senior officials / politicians in the community who have great fun with “dividing and ruling”. We have, basically all, common needs and common interests.
Many divisions such as in the landscape, in nations, in religions, language background, the party affiliation and so on. are inhuman, unnatural, artificial, and oppose the materialistic and substantive equality, peace, understanding, cooperation, etc..
Before we proceed to discuss advanced political strategies, we need to clarify a few simple concepts and possibly questioning them. Here is the discussion about political parties. What is a party in the ordinary sense and what is a “party/social movement” under direct democratic philosophy?
In the usual parties, “the strategist” has “a mandate” to act independently of the party’s behalf and, if so, “the strategist” is an experienced politician with any advanced knowledge on game theory.
Precondition for a direct democratic “party/social movement” is that the members must cooperate very well internally and this is already a big issue. We can lead by example and demonstrate to all parties how perfectly we work together, how good we are in agreement and how “we all speak with one voice!”.
When common sense and good conscience will prevail, it is easier to get along on the best solution for every problem. No parties and no political strategists are needed, only a good single global, popular and social human movement.
fred.blomson@hotmail.com,
http://nomokrati.wordpress.com in swedish
http://elaws.wordpress.com in english
Bilaga | Storlek |
---|---|
50%STARVING5.jpg | 34.11 kB |